How to Write a Hybrid Memoir

Today’s post is by author Adriana Barton (@AdrianaBarton).


I didn’t plan on writing a science memoir.

My first outline of Wired for Music (published in October 2022) focused on the neurology, anthropology and health benefits of music. In my mind, these elements held more than enough fascination to carry a book. But before my agent inked the deal, my publisher had one major request: “Can you put more of yourself in the book?”

“Sure,” I said, envisioning extra scenes from my childhood music lessons sprinkled in the first chapter or two. I sent a revised outline … and got the same feedback. “More of you.”

Readers of early drafts echoed the publisher’s words: “Your stories are so compelling. Can you add more of them?”

This more-of-you refrain was the last thing I wanted to hear.

As a science journalist, I was mainly interested in the geeky side of music—its effects on our brainwaves, neurochemicals, mental and physical health. I didn’t want to write about my sad-sack story as a failed cellist who no longer played the instrument I had studied for 17 years. Decades had passed since those painful days, and I had no desire to relive them.

Yet my tormented story with music was the one people wanted most. The injuries, the self-doubt. The high points, including a performance at Carnegie Hall, and the rigid training that had turned me away from classical music for good.

Maybe mining the past, I told myself, was the best way to draw readers to a book in the increasingly saturated music-on-the-brain vein.

Even as I assured my publisher I was up to the task, inwardly, I balked. Wired for Music would be my first attempt to write anything longer than a 4,000-word magazine feature. How was I supposed to graft a memoir onto chapters of popular science?

I found little in the way of useful instruction online, and no one I asked could offer a clear roadmap. Months, nay years, of frustration lay ahead.

And so, I offer my trial-and-error tale in hopes it will shorten the learning curve for other hybrid memoirists (reluctant or not).

To be clear, there is still an appetite for straight-up science books. Recent bestsellers include An Immense WorldThe Song of the Cell, Stolen FocusThe Insect Crisis. The list goes on.

More and more, though, we’re seeing hybrid memoirs such as Lab Girl (botany blended with the author’s coming-of-age as a scientist), The Invisible Kingdom (a fusion of memoir and reportage on chronic illness), The Soul of an Octopus (in which a naturalist ponders the nature of consciousness through communion with cephalopods) and the recent Heartbreak (a divorced journalist’s science-based exploration of heartache and grief).

All are great books, and in many cases, the personal angle might have been the author’s choice.

But nonfiction authors are under increasing pressure to permeate their books with their own experiences and emotions. Publishers seem convinced it’s not enough to distill research into well-written prose. Readers want an intimate story, too.

Like it or not, publishers may be right.

As the author-anthropologist Barbara J. King admitted on NPR, “I write science, but I read memoir.” Combining the two can turbo-charge the message, she wrote: “What may strike a reader as somewhat abstract in science writing may become more real when encountered in a searing narrative of a person’s own highly specific experience.”

Much as we are wired for music, humans are wired for story. (This wiring helps explain why even highly intelligent people get sucked in by conspiracy theories.) As conduits for informing, convincing and entertaining us, stories trump facts every time.

Unfortunately for authors, the hybrid memoir is tough to pull off. In my case, the structural demands of blending science with memoir became the defining challenge of my book—one I did not overcome until the final edit.

From the start, I knew my personal story didn’t have enough drama to sustain a narrative arc. I was never a child prodigy, nor did I quit classical music only to later catapult to fame as a rockstar. So, I decided a progression of science topics should be the backbone of the book.

I modeled my new outline after Abraham Maslow’s “hierarchy of needs.” Maslow (likely inspired by Blackfoot teachings) proposed that psychological growth depended on fulfilling a series of needs, starting with the necessities of survival and culminating in self-actualization. Using this framework, I started with a chapter on the evolutionary roots of music and ended with one on music’s role in the universal search for meaning.

So far, so good. But where did my story fit in?

I kept hoping to find the perfect hybrid structure and then fill in the blanks. But creative writing doesn’t work that way. A control-freak approach to structure can drain writing of its spark, leaving it as lifeless as the dully competent books churned out by ChatGPT. On the flip side, too little attention to structure makes for a hot mess.

During my second year of full-time work on the book, I followed an author friend’s advice: “Write first thing in the morning, stream of consciousness, and see what kinds of connections your mind comes up with.”

I gave myself several months to sink in to old memories, even when it felt like wallowing. At one point, I spent two weeks reading old news reports and weeping about a tragic loss, jotting down words for a passage that ended up occupying just two pages of my book. I didn’t always enjoy the process (I was already past deadline and needed to get cracking) but this suspended-animation phase was a crucial step in allowing my book to find its rhythm.

In between bursts of writing, I spoke with authors who had tackled the hybrid genre. Inevitably, they warned, some readers will complain about too much science while others will grouse about too much memoir. “You will never please everyone.”

But I could try to please myself.

For more than a year, I read hybrid memoirs including Nerve: Adventures in the Science of FearHello I Want to Die Please Fix Me: Depression in the First Person; First, We Make the Beast Beautiful: A New Journey Through Anxiety; and Feasting Wild: In Search of the Last Tamed Food

I noticed three things about hybrid memoirs that I liked most:

  1. The memoir elements were tightly integrated with the science passages, without dragging the reader through superfluous details and unrelated periods in the author’s life.
  2. While the book’s main topic (science, mental health, etc.) took center stage, the informational passages never droned on for more than four or five pages without a story break.
  3. Even if the memoir element was subservient to the science, the author experienced some kind of epiphany or personal transformation by the end.

In contrast, many of the less successful books did a bait-and-switch, hooking the reader with a compelling personal story at the start of the book and then hammering them with chapter after chapter of non-stop science.

With these points in mind, I began to plot my memoir passages in a loose progression, independent of the science sections. Then, using the index-card feature in Scrivener, I looked at the different ways the science and memoir passages could intersect. This process was often maddening, since the same anecdote could dovetail with any number of science concepts, depending on how the anecdote was framed. Gradually, though, the weighting of science and story became more balanced. Or so I thought.

When I delivered my manuscript (after two years of full-time writing and many more of research), none of the passages was boring or long-winded. My book was well on its way to publication, right?

Not quite.

My editor wrote back describing my narrative as choppy and emotionally unsatisfying. I’d welded the science passages together with personal stories without paying enough attention to chronology. The timeline was confusing, my editor said, and major scenes lacked the scaffolding needed to reach emotional heights.

Back to the drawing board—this time under intense stress. I had eight weeks to overhaul the manuscript.

Fortunately, my editor offered a structural solution: start and end each chapter with a personal passage, giving readers a touchstone to orient themselves in my story. I could still zip back and forth in time within each chapter, my editor said, but at least one thread of the book needed to be chronological.

At first, I resisted this plan. How could I summon meaningful anecdotes to illustrate the science concepts while ensuring these memories were in the right timeline for each chapter? This dilemma reminded me of the structural challenges Rebecca Skloot detailed about her bestselling book The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks. After years of tearing her hair out, she too decided that one of the narrative threads had to be chronological.

At the same time, my book needed a more emotionally satisfying conclusion. I reread notes from a webinar on memoir structure taught by Allison K Williams via Jane Friedman’s website (worth every penny). Williams emphasized that a memoir needs to build towards a personal transformation or resolution. If you don’t have a resolution to the fundamental problem or pain point presented at the start of the book, she said, you need to figure it out (or live the experiences you need to figure it out) before the writing is complete. Hybrid memoirs were no exception.

Brainstorming, I tried mapping my experiences onto the archetypical hero’s journey plot found in movies ranging from Star Wars to The Wizard of Oz. (Time was tight, so why try to reinvent the wheel?)

In this age-old story template, the “hero” (or average person like me) faces an untenable situation (in my case, an unresolved relationship to music). After a period of struggle, the hero learns a lesson, wins a victory with that knowledge and then returns to the starting point, transformed.

While my book is mostly chronological, Wired for Music starts in medias res, with me in my thirties haunted by the cello hiding in a battered case behind the couch. My hero’s journey involves a burning need to confront the forces that severed my relationship to music, understand where music comes from in our species, along with its therapeutic effects, and then grapple with my inner barriers to creating a healthier relationship with music—and myself.

After frantic weeks of rearranging chunks of narrative and writing new passages to bookend each chapter, I managed to meet my deadline. This time, my editor gave Wired for Music the green light.

Months later, the blend of science and memoir became my book’s calling card. “Thoroughly researched and tenderly written,” wrote The Globe and Mail. “Witty and soulful,” Publishers Weekly declared. Wired for Music has been featured in The Boston Globe, a BBC science podcast, CTV’s daytime talk show “The Social” and many other media outlets.

I would never recommend writing a hybrid memoir as a first book. But now that the heavy lifting is done, I can confirm that bridging the gap between research and personal experience can become a book’s greatest strength—as long as the author is prepared for a Herculean endeavor.

P.S. I highly recommend the following resources:

Share on:
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

11 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Carol

Wow. Excellent. Answered so
Many writing and memoir questions. Thank you for sharing yourself.

Adriana Barton

Thanks, Carol! Glad to help.

Mel Laytner

When I first spotted “Hybrid Memoir” in the headline, I thought, uh-oh, the writer is gonna justify some post-modern construct of facts and fiction and call it a more authentic form of memoir. Thankfully, she did not.

Instead, she describes a tortuous process very similar to the one I navigated in writing my investigative memoir What They Didn’t Burn, about uncovering a hidden Nazi paper trail that revealed my father’s Holocaust secrets.

I had been a reporter of hard news for some 20 years, much of it as a foreign correspondent for NBC News and United Press International. From the get-go, I knew whatever I wrote would be nonfiction — not an “inspired by” or “based on” novel, or a well-researched historical fiction. Because even with good historical fiction, you never know where history leaves off and fiction begins. The rare material I had uncovered was too important for those kinds of doubts.

Like Adriana, I airily dismissed suggestions that I would have to explore my innermost motives and feelings about my father, who died in 1985. Writing how I felt was simply not what reporters did. I saw the book essentially as an exercise in investigative journalism 101: I had uncovered startling documents, interviewed witnesses, and corroborated facts. The story would tell itself.

Once I started writing, I gradually realized everybody was right and I was wrong. To be compelling (and marketable), the book would have to be more than, as the libel lawyers say, a fair and true report. Personal motives matter. Exploring them publicly was hard. 

Yet, the bottom line for these kinds of memoir is sticking to facts, resisting the urge to dramatize the undramatic, insinuate significance into the insignificant, draw sharp conclusions from vague evidence, or, conversely, ignore hard evidence in favor of facts I might reasonably presume to improve the narrative.

Adriana Barton

Hi Mel,

I agree with you wholeheartedly. Despite the discomfort writing from a personal perspective (typical of journalists), in cases like ours, a refusal to reveal or explore a lifelong connection to the material would be a glaring omission.

However, as you rightly point out, personal disclosure in researched non-fiction isn’t license to ignore hard evidence or “dramatize the undramatic.” (Otherwise known as milking the material!)

It sounds like we took a similar approach, applying the same rigor to the personal passages as to the investigations. In my case, I combed through diaries from my childhood, interviewed family members and characters from my mother’s past, looked up old news clippings of my activities and dug up stashes of memorabilia. (In a box in the garage, I discovered the program from Carnegie Hall bearing my name in small print, along with the album cover that Yo-Yo Ma signed for me on my 16th birthday, just before he invited me to try his Stradivarius cello.)

None of my personal passages were fabricated for narrative effect.

In my case, the memoir angle was absolutely appropriate for my material, and made for a better book. But I don’t think this approach should become the default for non-fiction.

A few writers in a private message group pointed out that the straight-up science books I listed in my post were all written by people who identify as men, while the hybrid memoirs I cited were mainly by authors who identify as women. Several writers expressed concern that there might be a gendered component to the “hybrid memoir” trend.

I don’t know enough about the publishing industry to confirm this fear. But I firmly believe that the personal element should only be included if it truly enhances the reader’s understanding of the material (never for marketing purposes alone).

By the way, your investigative memoir “What They Didn’t Burn” sounds like a fascinating read. Thanks for describing it!

Liesbet

When I read non-fiction or “self help” books, I’m always drawn to the personal anecdotes the most. They are the most enticing as I feel many topics touch on common sense and stuff that I know – and practice – already. Your hybrid memoir sounds intriguing – combining science and personal anecdotes is also a great way to teach the “average reader” a thing or two. Thanks for this article!

Adriana Barton

Thanks, Liesbet. I do think the personal angle can increase emotional resonance for readers, as long as it’s not added only for marketing purposes. It works better if it’s a genuine exploration of the writer’s connection to the material, not a superficial tacking-on of personal anecdotes.

I’m glad you like the sound of my book! “Wired for Music” is not self-help, but some of the research does offer handy health hacks for readers paying attention. 😉

Maureen Conlan (Mo)

This is such a helpful essay. Thank you.

Adriana Barton

Nice to hear, Maureen!

Natalie Hanemann

Thank you, Adriana. Your post here provides me with a roadmap to the structure that I needed clarity on. I’m writing my first book, a hybrid memoir (was so relieved to see that term because to just say “memoir” or “nonfiction” felt incomplete) and have structured and restructured the chapter outlines before writing too much material. I’m a fiction/nonfiction book editor by trade and I knew this upfront work would save me months of revisions. But I was missing the application of the Hero’s Journey, something I tell my fiction authors to utilize, but not something I thought would apply to my story because I’m still wrestling with the ultimate lesson learned. I don’t have resolution…I have the ongoing pursuit to keep refining and a strengthening of the resiliency muscle that will continue until the end. I don’t think we ever fully end our “grappling with the inner barriers” and find peace until we take our last breath. So I have to keep noodling on how to find a satisfying “end” that isn’t quite so neat as Dorothy getting on the hot air balloon and heading back to Kansas.

Sushama Kirtikar

Thank you for sharing your story Adriana Barton. I had organically decided to write a memoir weaving in the science of Positive Psychology and thought naively that it would be smooth. I have recently learned the term ‘hybrid memoir’. The more I learn about it, the more I get its complexity. It gives me pause. Reading your story is inspiring. I know this will be a long journey of learning. I am open.

Stacy

This was both reassuring and practical. Thank you Adriana and Jane!