The Flashback: A Greatly Misunderstood Storytelling Device

Image: a wooden sign is erected amid tall grasses in a wilderness area. On the sign are the words "Future" accompanied by an arrow pointing to the right, and "Past" accompanied by an arrow pointing to the left.
Photo by Hadija on Unsplash

Today’s post is by editor Tiffany Yates Martin (@FoxPrintEd).


They’re the bogeymen of publishing. Along with prologues, adverbs, and semicolons, flashbacks may be the most vilified—and most misunderstood—of storytelling devices, ones that work only if they don’t seem like devices.

Yet flashbacks are inherently artificial. Even when we are revisiting memories in life, we rarely replay an entire scene from start to finish, chronologically and in full detail. Memory doesn’t work that way; it’s slideshows and not a movie.

But one prime reason that flashbacks are a common literary convention is that, used well, they can be an effective way to present essential information and backstory. Readers have become trained, as with so many fictional devices, to accept the artificiality of flashback provided it doesn’t interrupt their experience of the story.

And there is where the trap lies that so often derails an author’s attempt to use flashback: If not woven seamlessly into the flow of the story, a flashback can draw attention to itself, reveal the author’s hand, and pull the reader out of the fictive dream.

But you don’t have to avoid this potentially potent device as long as you follow a few key guidelines in weaving flashbacks seamlessly into your story.

1. Determine whether a flashback is in fact necessary.

Before you start wielding this potent and potentially disruptive weapon, let’s examine why you want to brandish it at all. Flashback is like cayenne pepper—a little bit can add spice and depth to the stew; too much can overwhelm it.

The main misstep I see in flashbacks is using them as backstory dumps of information authors think readers need to know to understand the story or characters. That may in fact be the case, but paving in background via flashback can be like wielding a machete where you needed a scalpel.

There are three main forms of introducing backstory:

  • Context: This is information woven into the main story throughout, often so seamlessly you don’t even realize how much information you’re getting amid the forward movement of the story.
  • Memory: When characters call to mind details from their past—still within the action of the “real-time” main story.
  • Flashback: A scene from the past presented as if it’s happening “live” before readers’ eyes, which fully interrupts the main story.

It’s this last form that makes flashbacks so dangerous. Used unskillfully or too often, they lend an erratic feel and potentially compromise readers’ engagement.

A good, healthy chunk of the time (let’s say 80–85 percent, because you can’t really quantify story with math, but it sounds right), context is going to be the most fluid, seamless, and organic way to incorporate backstory. The rest of the time memory is the most effective device.

That remaining little sliver is where flashbacks come in.

So when you use them, use them judiciously—like that cayenne pepper. Ask yourself what makes flashback the strongest way to incorporate the backstory, worth its many risks. That will often be one of several reasons:

  • It’s an essential, defining element of the character’s past relevant to the current story and their arc—like their main “wound” or a formative event that dictates or materially affects the character’s journey in this story.
  • It’s a “secret” or reveal that’s finally being fully shared—one central enough to the main story to warrant a full dramatization.
  • It’s brief, woven into a “real-time” scene, and serves to heighten impact, stakes, or meaning in the main story. Often this type of flashback will be just a few paragraphs.

2. Determine the most effective placement for a flashback.

The most challenging place for a flashback is opening your story. It can disorient or confuse readers—like walking into a room looking backward—and risks feeling like a false promise of what the story is actually about. That said, an opening flashback can work if used deliberately and well, and usually kept ruthlessly short.

There are no real “rules” or systems for where to place a flashback, but a good guideline with all backstory is to ask yourself my version of the “Watergate question”: What does the reader need to know and when do they need to know it?

Overloading readers with backstory before we’re fully invested in the main story hamstrings its effectiveness. The author’s job is to find where a flashback most effectively serves and furthers the main story by offering essential backstory at the most impactful, germane time—which ties into the next guideline.

3. Move the story forward, both within the flashback and in the main story.

Imagine a friend is telling you the harrowing tale of her recent car accident when she stops suddenly to relive shopping for that car just days earlier.

That fact may be relevant to heightening stakes and impact for the wreck—dammit, it was her brand-new dream car!—but in the middle of the much more relevant action of the story it stops momentum cold.

This is when flashbacks fail, as if the author is putting the main story on ice while she takes the reader on a journey down Memory Lane.

It’s the trickiest balancing act. Authors should use flashbacks in a way that still move the main story forward, even as we are briefly glancing backward.

That means the flashback should not only encompass its own strong forward momentum within the scene it presents, but its use at its particular point in the story should also serve to move the main story forward—usually in one of the ways described above.

4. Transition smoothly into and out of the flashback.

Here’s the make-or-break logistical challenge in flashback deployment: You must fluidly guide readers both into and out of it. That means avoiding a clumsy introductory device like “She remembered it as if it were yesterday” or “The scene unfolded in her mind like a movie…”, or plopping us back into the story afterward with an awkward, “Back in the present…” or “She shook her head to clear the memory.”

There are two common ways to incorporate flashback fluidly: Anchor some key aspect of the flashback in something that’s happening in the current moment. Or, with standalone flashback scenes, a space break is sufficient to set it off as a separate scene from the past. But it’s still useful to segue in and out in a way that ties it to the main story without hanging a lantern on the transition. Learn more here about weaving flashbacks seamlessly into your story.

Share on:
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

8 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ken Hughes

Completely agree. Flashbacks have their uses, but we do need to keep in mind how unnatural they are, compared to organically following context or memory. These are memories a person’s already lived and packed away for their own uses, so it takes a lot to even pretend someone would stop cold and relive something in full detail.

The troublesome thing is that movies and TV do it all the time, because they’re built mostly out of complete scenes anyway… they can’t just have a heroine look at someone and think “Like I’d ever trust a man again” and let more come up soon. Books can do this right, and we only need flashbacks when they’re actually worth it.

Ken_Hughes.JPG
Tiffany Yates Martin

They are so WEIRD and unnatural! But we accept them for the reason you suggest, I think–we’ve seen them used as a convention so often in books, movies, and TV shows. They have a lot of power when used well, but it’s good to treat them like uranium to make sure you correctly harness all that power rather than letting it cause disasters. 🙂

Susan DeFreitas

Great post, Tiffany!

Tiffany Yates Martin

Thanks, Susan!

joanna elm

Flashbacks have become the bete noir of today’s fiction because readers’ attention spans are so short. It used to be that bestselling authors like Judith Krantz or Jackie Collins or Richard North Patterson used flashbacks all the time. A reader would settle into the story and enjoy the backstory whenever it appeared knowing that he/she would come back to the present narrative soon enough! I had many reviews of my recent thriller, Fool Her Once, commenting that the flashbacks slowed down the momentum but then stated that once he/she was into the story, he/she understood why the flashback was there.

Tiffany Yates Martin

I agree that attention spans have shortened and that affects current market “styles” for books, which may be part of the flashback shift. But more than that, I think they can pull focus and stall momentum if they aren’t woven in seamlessly and used judiciously. Of course, you’re never going to please all readers!

val payn

I read a lot of negative comments about flashbacks, yet in Stephen Kings The Shining, Carrie and The Green Mile they are crucial to building tension. Take out the flashbacks and the ‘thrill’ in these thrillers disappears and they simple become macabre, rather dull horrors.

Tiffany Yates Martin

Backstory is essential to good story, and King is certainly a master in his field–I always find his stories very readable and with strong forward momentum. I think the trick is to balance what is presented as flashback with what is woven in as context–and being responsive to the story’s needs. Agents and editors (and even readers) often bemoan flashbacks I think because they see a lot of clumsy ones.